So many books, so little time

Comments

[this is good]
I feel your pain. I have decided, due to a desire to have a more minimal lifestyle, that one CAN actually have too many books and, if they are not going to be read again in the next, say, 10 years, then what you have is a collection, not a library. So I have become much more ruthless with the books I have read.

I try to re-read at the rate of 2 new, 1 old, to help with the culling.

Do you post to the group Be Your Own Personal Library? I have found some good ideas for new reads there.
No, I haven't joined any groups here on Vox. But I am a passionate advocate of re-reading. I have thirtysome year old paperback fantasies which I have read over and over and over--and thirtysome years ago, they made paperback books that could take that kind of wear.
I got those sort too - Andre Norton's complete Witch World somehow never makes the cull. Or Pratchett. Or Tom Holt - though I am wavering a little on him, now.

I agree with the not making books the way they used to. Trade size paperbacks tend to be a bit sturdier though.

I don't get people who say What, you'll read it again? like it's a big, strange thing. I bet they have TV series on DVD which they watch over and over. (Babylon 5 & Farscape for me!)
A fellow B5 fan! Londo is my Woobie. [g]

My mother-in-law is a strong, intelligent, vital woman in her eighties. She reads a great deal, but I don't think she ever re-reads a novel or memoir. She may look repeatedly at things that are history or mainly pictorial, but once the story is read, it's over. I do not understand.
Best bit for me was Vir Cotto waving at Mr Morden's severed head. He quite enjoyed that!

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in